623
Capt. Taylour's chief complaints are as follows:
(1) The Chan Pui affair. In October 1910, the shroff Wong-diau-lha absconded with some $3,800 of public money. The Governor considered that Capt. Taylour's supervision had not been adequate and called upon him to pay $750, with the approval of the Secretary of State at the time. This decision of the Governor was upheld by the Secretary of State. Recently, a Chinese Clerk, Chan Pui, absconded with some $30,000 of Government money, and was convicted. Thereupon Capt. Taylour proceeded to appeal against the decision taken in 1910 on the ground that it was now clear that the fault was that of Chan Pui. Mr. Bushe advised that the conviction could not be regarded as a fait nouveau undermining the action previously taken, and Capt. Taylour was consequently informed in a letter from this office dated the 18th of August (38526) that the Secretary of State did not consider that the recent conviction of Chan Pui was a fait nouveau which would undermine the action previously taken in his case, that action having been based on a lack of supervision on his part. The letter added that Lord Harcourt did not consider that he need regard the circumstances as having cast any slur on his character, the action taken having been due barely to the fact that the Governor at that time did not consider...
by Capt Taylour of
47661/1420
on £100
£100. We agreed on both claim from him, but only this debt due aim of £2-4-6, which the C.A. had paid him by a misunderstanding of the rate of Admnt Won Bomer, due to him from ...
Such are the three referred to. He has been refused ... There is no reason why Col. Amery should not see him if he is prepared to state facts. The Committee cannot recommend bushing this tale; but in listening to any of his case facts... unless he produces some new matter...
Page 623
7415
... attend the General Papers ... that post. Caft Taylour has to many subjects of complaint that it is impossible ...
(There is a mention of 27408 and 38526 in the original text, already included in the proofread text as a file reference)
##
...
Marthart Ad ... the H. K. Prize Court, so that I have to attend ...
by Caft Taylow of
47661/1420
on £100
£100. We agreed on
both claim
from him, but only
this debt
due
aim of £2-4-6, which
the C.A. had paid him by a misunderstanding o
i
i
the rate of Admnt Won Bomer,
due to him from
BORANEKIN ON CAPTAIN TAYLOUR'S GRIEVANCES.
623
Capt.Taylour's chief complaints are as
follows:←
(1) The Chan Pui affair. In October 1910
A the shroff Vơng-diau-lha absconded with some 3,800
dollars of public money.
The Governor considered
that Capt.Taylour's supervision had not been
adequate and called upon him to pay 750 dollars,
with the afferval of the This decision of the Governo
Secretary of State at the time.
www upheld by the
Recently a
C.A.
banchal Page Cuft's Coth does not mention
any complaints about
his paint.
Marthart
Ad
the H. K. Prize Count, so that I have aft
attend the General Papus
m
that ponst.
7415
attend
Caft Zaytour has to many subjects of
complaint that it is
Such
impossible of
Jay are the three referred B. He has
been refused
There is
qu
caturvilis with in Sess.
leason why Col. Awery shot wit
see him if he is prepared to taste fent
the
Com o
:the defit cannot recommend
bishing this tale; but
in listening
Crven
any
of his case facts.
unless be produces some need
43c71f2
matter who
to atten
זי
27408)
Chinese Clerk, Chan Pui, absconded with some
30,000 dollars of Goverment money, and was
convicted.
Thereupon Capt.Taylour proceeded to
appeal against the decision taken in 1910 on the
ground that it was now clear that the fault was
that of Chan Pui. Hr.Bushe advised that the
conviction could not be regarded as a fait nouveau
undermining the action previously taken, and
Capt.Taylour was consequently informed in a letter
from this office dated the 18th of August (38526)
that the Secretary of State did not consider that
the recent conviction of Chan Pui was a fait nouveau
which would undersine the action previously taken
in his case, that sotion having been based on a lack
of supervision on his part. The letter added that
Lord Hilner did not consider that he need regard the
circumstances as having cast any slur on his
character, the notion taken having been due barely to
the fact that the Governor at that time did not
consider
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.